Contemplating Hubble's law and looking at his graph (obtained from NASA's home page), we see recessional velocity is direct proportional to the distance of galaxies removed from us given in light years, indicating a growing expansion rate the further we go back in time. Today, at zero distance into the past, we read recessional velocity is zero. We did it! We have reached maximum universal expansion! It says so right on the graph. Why does not everybody see this? One would think that the different velocities we assign to the different galaxies making up the above chart give us the rate of expansion the universe had when the respective galaxy sent out its tell-tale light which we receive today, reporting on the state of affairs at that particular point in the past. At that time, our own Galaxy shared the same rate, naturally, since expansion and contraction are an absolute event. If absolute time τ provides for the radius to our sphere with big bang as the source, then we can see the 4 dimensions (x,y,z,t) of our manifesting universe represented by (or compressed into) the 2 dimensions of our shell (x,t), and so have a model which shows the universe from the begin to the end in its entirety. This is such an easy model to see (including the build-in answers to speculations regarding space travel and other engineering tasks), but nowhere is reference to this vision be found. Today, "the Body of all bodies is at rest." This is what Hubble tells us. This vision explains the constancy of the speed of light, because light may just work under the laws of absolute time which as a vector stands as a 5th dimension perpendicular to our 4 dimensional world, and does not "butch", or is in any way subject to any of our activities within space-time but has its own timing, "holding the Shell at bay" never mind its internal upheaval. This gives us a brand new reference, a new way of thinking. It gives us a temporary "steady state" of which Einstein was so fond talking about, to last us a few hundred thousand years (±2 kiloG) backwards and forwards, with us at 1G right next to the centre. This realization gives us great joy and a good feeling. It gives us the idea and its vision, granted from above, to see us all together, with nobody ever lost.

If you look into the sky, take the glare out of the galaxy and look into the fulness of a cluster filled universe. Let's shrink the galaxy to a point. Now you can see puffs of super clusters, anywhere you look. If you look hard enough, you could see the back of your shirt. Well, you are not supposed to see that because you are looking from "within" and your sight is limited by the speed of light (and tons of other technical problems). But if you could see things "from without", you would not believe this "carrier of data" moves at all. It looks like stuck in glue forever. Here, absolute time becomes a useful instrument to describe the recession of clusters from each other like "raisins in a rising dough". At the instant of big bang, "matter manifests in the pattern of His Light" (and in which the begin and the end are nothing but a focal point in a never changing Mind), and we are compelled to say: "At τ = BB, the recessional velocity equals the speed of light." (Well, we know this to be nonsense since the velocity of expansion of space-time is not subject to the speed of light within the Body of manifestation, but for simplification, this should do for now.) Sure, there are only hydrogen atoms in a sudden void, but the wish to flee cools things down creating gravity and attraction to result in manifestation of matter and space & time and in accordance to the pattern of the explosion of the "White Light" in the stillness of God's Mind. (Naturally, without our "time-is-real trained mind" there is no explosion, only the intensity of the "Bright White Light" at τ = ±BB. (See also "Absolute & relative time".) At t = 0 BC, recessional velocity is zero too,- which means maximum expansion has been reached, and this is what we are experiencing now. But without Life, Creation makes no sense. τ = ±2 megaG have been reserved for "Life on Earth", even though Man has long left the earth. Centred around maximum universal expansion is its useful range. The rest is construction and demolition to balance the illusion out. We use the huge areas in Memory, lying dormant, to expand. Please wake up and understand.

Einstein's biggest blunder was not his struggle trying to keep his beloved steady state theory of the universe artificially alive, first feeling attacked by Friedmann with his 3 possible models of universal states based on Einstein's 4-dimensional relativity (closed, flat, forever expanding, and with "flat" meaning too unstable to last), then from Hubble with his findings straight from the universe of a seemingly iron-clad proof of a universal expansion, but to accept and see expansion and contraction as an absolute event.  So he quickly invented some magic formulae to keep the universe from deviating from this personally sponsored model of choice, as if he was its chief designer, and responsible for it. Only if we visualize a small model of the universe and forget about the speed of light can we see a 3-D movement of galaxies and clusters moving away from each other in our mind, as of "right now", giving us a faulty impression. His steady state was never challenged. The thing is, Edwin Hubble never gave a personal interpretation of his own findings. For that he was too much of a gentleman. He left that honour to the famous Herrn Doktor Albert Einstein, the one who came to visit him, the highly distinguished and honoured Professor from the Technical University of Berlin, the only "TU" there is in Germany (because of the "durchlauchte" distinction given this noble institution). Einstein saw a distorted picture, sad to say, looking at Edwin Hubble's graph, stuck in his 4-dimensional, relative world. He could not see the 5th dimension shining Light on all his problems. He denied it vehemently without knowing it. However, "you cannot do without the Absolute!" To see what he thought he saw means one has to assume the speed of light to be infinite to fit our scaled down model of a mental picture in 3 dimensions, fooling us to believe that we are still expanding like "raisins in a rising dough". We are not. Wir sind kein Grossmutter Kuchen. He saw the process of expansion of all parts, like galaxies, clusters of galaxies, clusters of clusters, nebulae etc., as if they were taking off from us as of "right now" in absolute terms,  into well prepared, "prefabricated" areas of space, even though he was at a loss to define this "now" which is nothing but dτ => 0, and valid throughout the universe. Had he given the problem of discussing this most simple graph to any high school kid in grade 9 in Berlin, the correct answer sure would have been: "the further we dip into our past, the faster we see the universe expanding. Therefore turning around and looking back from our platform of fast expansion, we return through periods of lesser rates of expansion until we come to were we are right now. Here, we are free from any expansion because the graph says so too, black & white for everybody to see, and Albert Einstein could have seen his cherished state (and ours too), accepted and verified by the academia "to be present right now, backwards & forwards, all around us as far as our horizon can see. We have hit the centre point of universal expansion!" He could have accepted the crown of total admiration in this world gracefully without doing anything else anymore, just leaning back enjoying an enlightened world caused by an enlightened mind (...and have his private life straightened out by the universe without trying to do it himself, nor having to sell atomic bombs to presidents in order to save the world.) Another problem was that Minkowski had given the world the tools to describe the geometry of a universe based on 4 dimensions and so the ability to see it as a sphere, simply by suppressing one spatial dimension, and where even a dull person (like me) can see the All as a ball, and understand what it means with the help of simple high school geometry. However, even though choosing 4 dimensions is a step in the right direction, it simply is not good enough. Expansion & contraction of the universe are an absolute event. Everywhere in the universe, we measure the same recession "at the same time." It requests an absolute time measure, a time vector, independent of internal speed restrictions, radiating in all directions from the origin also known as the big bang, ruling space and relative time, to hit us all around (in the universe) in the "now", indicating the size and the age of the universe itself. In our model of the universe, the "skin" or shell of our sphere now is not space with only (z) suppressed anymore, but space-time with (y,z) suppressed (or hidden), leaving (x,t) to represent manifestation (x,y,z,t) as a function of absolute time. The mixing up of our 2 quite distinct and different fundamental time elements describing our universe, one internally and the other one externally, and squeezing them into the same dimension regardless of direction and foundation, and Albert Einstein's failure to recognize the need for the dimension of absolute time in the understanding of the All, has lead to a spectacle of misled followers, arrogant beyond belief, too old to think for themselves, acting like the naked king trying to impress the crowd. Sorry for that, folks. Sarcasm is not my normal me. (It is my suppressed ego, enjoying a rare moment of harmless fun.)

Well, to hell, am i at fault, having some private fun? The "i" is a function of time, carried out in absolute time, and now we see it as a vector, and we see it balances the overall illusion. Okay? All illusions are balanced, or they would be real. Does this address the riddle string theory speaks of? It just depends on from which side you look at the outside. We, in reality being one, all have different outsides and perceptions, and there are barriers all around each of us. So we have layers in Consciousness made up by each of us piled on top of each other. To see subatomic strings is nothing but to look at the tip, the end of the ray on which the idea of hydrogen rests. If this is a live transmission line to the origin, here we see the vibration. You see strings when you look at the surface of our 5-dimensional sphere through a "mental microscope", holding the universe as it manifests each given moment in absolute time. We cannot do it in 4 dimension, we can do it only in mind. All is said with our vision "e = m times c squared", our mass and energy conversion. The ray means energy, and hydrogen represents this energy of the ray as mass, at a given expansion rate, for example where and when v = c, passing on the momentum of the ray for the outer expansion. For having come up with this vision and having seen this relationship so clearly, i kiss his feet. But it is not a good idea to build hydrogen bombs in order to save the world. It hurts the Body of God's Son. It is time we wake up and assess the damage we have done to the Body of our higher Self.